I feel your essay is about the different aesthetic interpretations of an image and how that can change the meaning of the original graphic. Your main graphic of the man walking stays the same, but the textures and treatment of the images changes and this changes the meaning of the image. Some are cracked and look more grungy and aged, there is one with what looks like blood spatter, and another that is old and looks stained. I think your idea is clear and was an important one from the reading.
I really like this animation and the original ones you posted in January. I kind of wish you have used the figure dressed in the military uniform, which may fits the filter even more. I like the fact that the figure is animated, it is very formalist in my opinion, I wish you could have done something like this in your last post.
Wei-en Yang 
February 27, 2017 at 5:40 pm
I feel your essay is about the different aesthetic interpretations of an image and how that can change the meaning of the original graphic. Your main graphic of the man walking stays the same, but the textures and treatment of the images changes and this changes the meaning of the image. Some are cracked and look more grungy and aged, there is one with what looks like blood spatter, and another that is old and looks stained. I think your idea is clear and was an important one from the reading.
LikeLike
May 1, 2017 at 10:23 pm
I really like this animation and the original ones you posted in January. I kind of wish you have used the figure dressed in the military uniform, which may fits the filter even more. I like the fact that the figure is animated, it is very formalist in my opinion, I wish you could have done something like this in your last post.
LikeLike